J Med Life Sci > Volume 22(1); 2025 > Article
Kim and Choi: Neurosonology education for undergraduate medical students in South Korea

Abstract

This study assessed the status of neurosonology education for undergraduate medical students in South Korea. An online survey was conducted between September 1 and October 31, 2022, among neurology faculty members at 40 medical schools. The survey consisted of 15 questions on existing neurosonology education and the willingness to integrate it into the undergraduate curriculum. Descriptive analyses were performed using the frequency and percentage distributions. The survey achieved an 80% response rate from 32 participating institutions. Among these, nine (28.1%) included neurosonology lectures in pre-clerkship neurology courses and 15 (46.9%) incorporated them into the neurology clerkship. However, 66.7% of the institutions offering neurosonology allocated less than 1 hour to education, and only 13% of the training involved hands-on courses. The rest relied on live demonstrations and lectures. Of the 17 institutions that did not provide neurosonology education during clerkship, 13 expressed willingness to introduce it in the future. No significant differences were found between institutions that offered neurosonology education and those that did not in terms of student numbers, neurology faculty size, years of establishment, or region. In conclusion, only half of medical schools in South Korea offer neurosonology education, and their programs are limited in time, content, and teaching methods. Expanding neurosonology education requires collaboration among experts in neurosonology, medical education, and other related fields.

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasonography is a non-invasive imaging method without radiation exposure, allowing for safe repeated examinations [1]. Ultrasonography not only assists in the evaluation and management of patients but also provides real-time imaging to facilitate invasive procedures [1,2]. With advancements in technology, ultrasound devices have become smaller in size, making them suitable for bedside, and their cost has also decreased [3]. Owing to these advantages, the utilization of ultrasonography in clinical practice is steadily increasing [1].
In South Korea, as of 2022, ultrasound machines were distributed at an average rate of 82.3 per hospital in tertiary centers and 17.9 per general hospital, with a continuing upward trend. Ultrasound machines are relatively widely distributed in South Korea, with a total count of 40,208, compared with other imaging devices such as computed tomography (2,295) or magnetic resonance imaging (1,934) [4].
Ultrasound education aimed at undergraduate medical students not only increases interest in ultrasound and enhances ultrasound skills but also elevates the understanding of anatomy, physical examination, physiology, and pathology [5-8]. Therefore, the importance of ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students has been increasingly emphasized [9].
Ultrasonography can also play a significant role in the education of undergraduate medical students in neurology [10]. In the field of neurology, ultrasonography is used in various areas, including carotid, transcranial, neuromuscular, and neurocritical care [11-13]. Ultrasonography can contribute to the understanding of anatomy, such as the cervical arteries, optic nerve, and peripheral nerves, and can assist in comprehending neurovascular physiology through the assessment of blood flow direction and velocity using Doppler ultrasound. It also has the potential to aid in understanding the principles underlying neurological examinations, such as carotid artery auscultation and deep tendon reflexes, and contribute to understanding the pathology of various neurological disorders. Ultrasound can be used for procedures, such as central venous catheter insertion, which are necessary for patients in neurocritical care [2]. Utilizing ultrasound, which is frequently used in clinical practice, can enhance students’ understanding of clinical situations [14,15].
In South Korea, there are 38 medical colleges and two medical schools, with annual enrollment ranging from 40 to 140 students per institution. On average, approximately 3,000 students graduate annually. Generally, undergraduate medical students in premedical courses study basic science, medical science, general education, and liberal arts. During the 4 years of undergraduate courses at medical colleges and schools, first-year students focus on basic medical science, second-year students study clinical science, third- and fourth-year students engage in clerkship and optional courses.
Although the importance of ultrasound education in undergraduate medical education has been emphasized globally, it seems that it is not widely used for undergraduate medical students in South Korea [7]. Furthermore, the allocated instructional time is insufficient in institutions where ultrasound education is offered [16]. In this study, as part of the process of developing a neurosonology curriculum for undergraduate medical students in South Korea, we aimed to assess the current state of ultrasound education during pre-clerkship neurology courses and neurology clerkships in medical colleges and schools. Furthermore, we assessed the willingness to implement ultrasound education in the neurology curriculum at institutions that do not currently provide neurosonology education.

METHODS

This study is a cross-sectional online survey conducted among neurology faculty at 38 medical colleges and two medical schools in South Korea. We distributed the survey questionnaire through Google Forms (Google, Mountain View, CA, USA) via e-mail from September 1, 2022, to October 31, 2022 (Table 1). Participation in the survey was voluntary and no incentives were provided. The survey consisted of 15 questions and took approximately 5 minutes to complete. The survey content was divided into three main sections: the current state of ultrasound lectures in neurology courses during the pre-clerkship phase of the curriculum, the current state of ultrasound education during neurology clerkships, and the intention to incorporate ultrasound education during neurology clerkships in the future. Detailed survey questions are presented in Table 1. In addition, we received information from the Korea Association of Medical Colleges regarding the number of medical students’ quota, the number of neurology faculties, years after the establishment and the location of the participating medical colleges and schools [17]. We analyzed the descriptive data, including frequency and percentage, using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). To compare the characteristics of medical colleges and schools that provide neurosonology education with those that do not, we used Fisher’s exact test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Two-tailed P-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). This study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Jeju National University Hospital (JEJUNUH 2023-11-004).

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 32 institutions (80.0%) out of 40 medical colleges and schools. The median number of students’ quotas was 76 (range, 44-144), and the median number of neurology faculties was 11 (range, 4-38). Nine were in the metropolitan area, and 23 were located outside the metropolitan area.
Among the 32 institutions that responded, nine (28.1%) included neurosonology lectures in their neurology courses, with eight institutions allocating less than 1 hour. One institution did not respond within the allocated timeframes. The content of neurosonology lectures included carotid and transcranial ultrasound in eight institutions (88.9%), while neuromuscular, neurocritical care ultrasound, or ultrasound principles each accounted for one institution (11.1%) (Fig. 1A).
Among the surveyed institutions, 29 required mandatory neurology clerkships, while three offered it as an elective. The duration of the neurology clerkship was primarily 2 weeks in 25 institutions, followed by 1 week in three institutions, 3 weeks in three institutions, and 4 weeks in one institution. The most common year for students to undergo neurology clerkships was the third year of the medical course, which was offered in 20 institutions. This was followed by the fourth year in 10 institutions, and the second year in two institutions. Of the 32 institutions offering neurology clerkships, 15 (46.9%) provided ultrasound education as part of the clerkship. The duration of ultrasound education during clerkship was primarily 1 hour in 10 institutions (66.7%), followed by 2 hours in three institutions (20.0%), and 3 hours in two institutions (13.3%). The content of ultrasound education during the neurology clerkship included carotid ultrasound in 13 institutions (86.7%), transcranial ultrasound in 12 institutions (80.0%), and neuromuscular ultrasound in two institutions (13.3%) (Fig. 1B). None of the institutions offered education on neurocritical care ultrasound. The primary method of teaching was live demonstrations, utilized by 11 institutions (73.3%), followed by lectures in five institutions (33.3%), and hands-on training in two institutions (13.3%) (Fig. 2).
Among the 17 institutions without neurosonology education during their neurology clerkship, 13 (76.5%) expressed their intention to incorporate neurosonology education in the future. Among the institutions expressing their intention to provide neurosonology education, 11 institutions (84.6%) were interested in carotid ultrasound, nine institutions (69.2%) were interested in transcranial ultrasound, and one institution was interested in neuromuscular ultrasound, ultrasound principles, and neurocritical care ultrasound. Regarding the methods of education, live demonstrations were the most common, with 11 institutions (84.6%), followed by lectures in four institutions (30.8%) and hands-on training in three institutions (23.1%). In terms of the allocated time for education, 1 hour was the most common duration, selected by 11 institutions (84.6%), followed by 2 hours, which was chosen by two institutions. The survey responses are summarized in Table 1.
There were no significant differences between medical colleges and schools that provided neurosonology education during clerkship and those that did not in terms of the number of students’ quotas (median, 49 vs. 93; P=0.162), number of neurology faculties (median, 11 vs. 11; P=0.557), years since the establishment of medical schools and colleges (median, 46 vs. 38; P=0.168), or region (P=0.699) (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

In the field of neurology, the significance of ultrasonography is on the rise, paralleled by an increasing emphasis on ultrasound education [10]. Recently, institutions offering ultrasound education have been expanding to include undergraduate medical students, not limited to residents [5,10,14]. In this study, we investigated the current state of ultrasound education during pre-clerkship neurology courses and neurology clerkships in medical schools and colleges in South Korea. The survey also asked about their willingness to implement ultrasound education in neurology clerkship in the future at institutions that do not provide neurosonology education currently.
In South Korea, neurosonology education has not been widely implemented during the pre-clerkship neurology course and clerkship, and the allocated time is very limited. Of the 32 medical colleges and schools that responded to the survey, only nine (28.1%) provided ultrasound education during neurology courses, and 15 (46.9%) provided it during neurology clerkship. The allocated time was limited to 1 hour or less. According to a previous report, the challenges in implementing ultrasound education included the difficulty of adding new content to established curricula, a shortage of trained faculty, and a lack of necessary ultrasound machines and facilities for education [14].
However, comparing the state of neurosonography education across countries is challenging. In the United States, 72.6% of medical schools offer ultrasound programs, although it is unclear whether these programs include neurosonography [18]. A survey of 46 universities in Europe indicated that theoretical education was provided by 87% of institutions, while hands-on training was available in only 56% [19]. However, this study also did not clarify whether neurosonography education was included. Additionally, in a survey of 42 countries, including Europe and beyond, 30.9% reported having neurosonography programs [20]. However, obtaining detailed information on how neurosonography education is implemented in each country remains difficult.
In both the pre-clerkship neurology course and the neurology clerkship, ultrasound education predominantly covered carotid and transcranial ultrasound, with relatively limited emphasis on neuromuscular and neurocritical care ultrasound. The method of education in neurology courses is primarily centered around live demonstrations, with hands-on training conducted at only two institutions. Hands-on methods, in which students actively perform ultrasound procedures themselves are not only effective in acquiring ultrasound skills but also crucial for gaining medical knowledge [5,21]. A notable positive aspect is that among the 17 institutions where neurosonology education was not provided during neurology clerkships, 13 expressed their intention to introduce neurosonology education in the future. Nevertheless, there is a limited willingness to provide education on neuromuscular and neurocritical ultrasound. Moreover, many institutions planned to prioritize live demonstrations over hands-on, and the allocated education time was often less than 1 hour.
Studies on neurosonology education are relatively limited compared with those on ultrasound education in other specialities. This study analyzed the impact of neurosonology education on the medical knowledge of undergraduate medical students [22]. The content included transcranial Doppler, ocular ultrasound, neck scan, central line placement, and external ventricular drain placement. The presence or absence of neurosonology education was not correlated with academic performance in medical schools. Nonetheless, one limitation of the study was the insufficient duration of education, as all five topics mentioned were covered within an hour.
This study has some limitations. First, the survey was conducted with only one neurology faculty from each medical college or school. Most were neurovascular specialists. Therefore, the status of neurosonology education, other than in the neurovascular field, at each institution may not have been thoroughly captured. However, respondents were selected because they were expected to be aware of the current state of ultrasound education at their affiliated medical colleges and schools. Second, the survey response rate was 80.0% and it did not include all medical colleges and schools. Third, the study did not analyze the reasons for the absence of neurosonology education in neurology courses or neurology clerkships.
In conclusion, this study revealed that less than half of the medical colleges and schools in South Korea provide neurosonology education for undergraduate medical students, and even when provided, there are limitations in terms of time, content, and methods of education in South Korea. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a dedicated neurosonology curriculum for undergraduate medical students, particularly for neurology clerkships. It is also essential to identify obstacles in the implementation of neurosonology education in South Korea. Furthermore, it is necessary to analyze the effectiveness of neurosonology education for students during their neurology clerkship. This study will be helpful in the development and implementation of neurosonology education for undergraduate medical students.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author reports no conflict of interest.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the 2024 education, research and student guidance grant funded by Jeju National University.

Figure 1.
Detailed contents of neurosonology lectures in the neurology course during pre-clerkship (A) and during neurology clerkship (B).
jmls-2025-22-1-8f1.jpg
Figure 2.
The teaching method of neurosonology education during the neurology clerkship.
jmls-2025-22-1-8f2.jpg
Table 1.
Survey on neurosonography education for undergraduate medical students
Question Response Value
A. The current state of ultrasound lectures in neurology course during preclerkship phase
 1. Are neurosonology lectures included in the neurology course? Yes 9 (28.1)
No 23 (71.9)
 2. How many hours are allocated for neurosonology lectures in the neurology course? 1 hour 8 (88.9)
No response 1 (11.1)
 3. What does the neurosonology lectures included in the neurology course cover? (multiple-choice) Carotid ultrasound 8 (88.9)
Transcranial ultrasound 8 (88.9)
Neuromuscular ultrasound 1 (11.1)
Neurocritical ultrasound 1 (11.1)
Ultrasound principle 1 (11.1)
B. The current state of ultrasound education during neurology clerkship
 1. Is neurology clerkship mandatory? Yes 29 (90.6)
No 3 (9.4)
 2. In which year of medical course does neurology clerkship take place? 2-year 2 (6.3)
3-year 20 (62.5)
4-year 10 (31.2)
 3. How many weeks does the entire neurology clerkship last? 1 3 (9.4)
2 25 (78.1)
3 3 (9.4)
4 1 (3.1)
 4. Is there any neurosonology education during the neurology clerkship? Yes 15 (46.9)
No 17 (53.1)
 5. What kind of neurosonology education is conducted during the neurology clerkship? (multiple-choice) Carotid ultrasound 13 (86.7)
Transcranial ultrasound 12 (80.0)
Neuromuscular ultrasound 2 (13.3)
Neurocritical ultrasound 0 (0.0)
Ultrasound principle 1 (6.7)
 6. During the neurology clerkship, when neurosonology education is provided, what teaching methods are employed? (multiple-choice) Lecture 5 (33.3)
Live demonstrations 11 (73.3)
Hands-on 2 (13.3)
 7. How many hours of neurosonology education are provided during the neurology clerkship? 1 10 (66.7)
2 3 (20.0)
3 2 (13.3)
C. The intention to incorporate ultrasound education during neurology clerkship in the future
 1. Do you have the intention to provide neurosonology education during future neurology clerkship? Yes 13 (76.5)
No 4 (23.5)
 2. If you plan to incorporate neurosonology education during future neurology clerkship, which areas are you considering? (multiple-choice) Carotid ultrasound 11 (84.6)
Transcranial ultrasound 9 (69.2)
Neuromuscular ultrasound 1 (7.7)
Neurocritical ultrasound 1 (7.7)
Ultrasound principle 1 (7.7)
 3. What teaching methods are you planning to employ for neurosonology education during neurology clerkship? (multiple-choice) Lecture 4 (30.8)
Live demonstrations 11 (84.6)
Hands-on 3 (23.1)
 4. How many hours of neurosonology education are you planning to allocate during neurology clerkship? 1 hour 11 (84.6)
2 hours 2 (15.4)
D. Information regarding the ultrasound specialization of the survey respondents
 1. Among the neurosonology subspecialty, which one is most relevant to you? Carotid or transcranial ultrasound 28 (87.5)
Neuromuscular ultrasound 3 (9.4)
No response 1 (3.1)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2.
Characteristics of medical schools and colleges based on the presence or absence of neurosonology education during the neurology clerkship
Neurosonology education during neurology clerkship Yes (n=15) No (n=17) P-value
Location 0.699
 Metropolitan area 5 (33.3) 4 (23.5)
 Nonmetropolitan area 10 (66.7) 13 (76.5)
Medical students’ quota 49 (40-108) 93 (76-125) 0.162
Neurology faculties 11 (9-18) 11 (5-16) 0.557
Years after the establishment 46 (44-64) 38 (36-56) 0.168

Values are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range).

REFERENCES

1. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011;364:749-57.
crossref pmid
2. Saugel B, Scheeren TWL, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care 2017;21:225.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
3. Baribeau Y, Sharkey A, Chaudhary O, Krumm S, Fatima H, Mahmood F, et al. Handheld point-of-care ultrasound probes: the new generation of POCUS. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020;34:3139-45.
crossref pmid pmc
4. National Health Insurance Service. Status of major medical equipment by region [Internet]. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; c2023 [cited 2024 Jul 22]. Available from: https://www.data.go.kr/data/15051055/fileData.do.
5. Chen WT, Kang YN, Wang TC, Lin CW, Cheng CY, Suk FM, et al. Does ultrasound education improve anatomy learning? Effects of the parallel ultrasound hands-on (PUSH) undergraduate medicine course. BMC Med Educ 2022;22:207.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Robba C, Goffi A, Geeraerts T, Cardim D, Via G, Czosnyka M, et al. Brain ultrasonography: methodology, basic and advanced principles and clinical applications. A narrative review. Intensive Care Med 2019;45:913-27.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Kim EY, Park KH, Choi SJ, Chung WJ. Educational value of pocket-sized ultrasound devices to improve understanding of ultrasound examination principles and sonographic anatomy for medical student. PLoS One 2017;12:e0185031.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Park S, Lee S, Do HH, Kim JS, Seo JS. Effectiveness of limited airway ultrasound education for medical students: a pilot study. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2019;6:257-63.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Siegel-Richman Y, Kendall J. Establishing an ultrasound curriculum in undergraduate medical education: how much time does it take? J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:569-76.
crossref pmid pdf
10. Shah VS, Cavalcanti M, Scheetz S, Bahner DP, Dornbos DL 3rd, Prats MI. Teaching neurological disorders with ultrasound: a novel workshop for medical students. Brain Circ 2020;6:38-46.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, Alexandrov AV, Baker JD, Bluth EI, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. Radiology 2003;229:340-6.
crossref pmid
12. Walker FO, Cartwright MS, Alter KE, Visser LH, Hobson-Webb LD, Padua L, et al. Indications for neuromuscular ultrasound: expert opinion and review of the literature. Clin Neurophysiol 2018;129:2658-79.
crossref pmid
13. Bidkar PU, Kannabiran N, Chatterjee P. Clinical applications of ultrasound in neurosurgery and neurocritical care: a narrative review. Med J Armed Forces India 2024;80:16-28.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Russell FM, Zakeri B, Herbert A, Ferre RM, Leiser A, Wallach PM. The state of point-of-care ultrasound training in undergraduate medical education: findings from a national survey. Acad Med 2022;97:723-7.
crossref pmid
15. Smalley CM, Thiessen M, Byyny R, Dorey A, McNair B, Kendall JL. Number of weeks rotating in the emergency department has a greater effect on ultrasound milestone competency than a dedicated ultrasound rotation. J Ultrasound Med 2017;36:335-43.
crossref pmid pdf
16. Tarique U, Tang B, Singh M, Kulasegaram KM, Ailon J. Ultrasound curricula in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. J Ultrasound Med 2018;37:69-82.
crossref pmid pdf
17. Korea Association of Medical Colleges. Basic medical education database [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Association of Medical Colleges; c2019 [cited 2024 Sep 16]. Available from: https://www.bmec.ac.kr/educ/index.jsp.
18. Nicholas E, Ly AA, Prince AM, Klawitter PF, Gaskin K, Prince LA. the current status of ultrasound education in United States medical schools. J Ultrasound Med 2021;40:2459-65.
crossref pmid pdf
19. Prosch H, Radzina M, Dietrich CF, Nielsen MB, Baumann S, Ewertsen C, et al. Ultrasound curricula of student education in Europe: summary of the experience. Ultrasound Int Open 2020;6:E25-33.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Baracchini C, Azevedo E, Walter U, Sargento-Freitas J, Malojcic B; Council of Nations of the European Society of Neurosonology and Cerebral Hemodynamics (ESNCH). Neurosonology survey in Europe and beyond. Ultrasound Int Open 2024;10:a22439625.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Dreher SM, DePhilip R, Bahner D. Ultrasound exposure during gross anatomy. J Emerg Med 2014;46:231-40.
crossref pmid
22. Shah VS, Allman A, Verbeck N, Quinn M, Prats MI. Ultrasound's impact on preclinical medical student neurology unit grades: findings after 2 years. J Ultrasound Med 2021;40:1903-10.
pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 398 View
  • 22 Download
ORCID iDs

Hong Jun Kim
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-5951

Jay Chol Choi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3550-2196

Related articles


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
102, Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju-si, Jeju-do 63243, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-64-754-8023    E-mail: jmls.jeju@jejunu.ac.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by Jeju National University Institute for Medical Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next