INTRODUCTION
Rare diseases are defined by their extremely low prevalence and limited patient population, resulting in a scarcity of information and posing significant challenges to diagnosis and treatment. Most rare diseases have unknown etiologies and are difficult to cure, often requiring lifelong management and prolonged care. Consequently, they impose substantial psychosocial [
1,
2] and economic burdens [
3,
4] on affected individuals and their families, along with considerable societal costs. Globally, more than 7,000 rare diseases have been identified, affecting an estimated 300 million people [
5]. However, due to a lack of specialists and infrastructure, even basic epidemiological data, such as accurate incidence and prevalence rates, remain insufficient for most rare diseases [
6].
Definitions of rare diseases vary across countries. The European Union (EU) defines them as conditions affecting fewer than 50 individuals per 100,000 people, while the United States categorizes them as diseases affecting fewer than 200,000 individuals nationwide. In Japan, rare diseases are defined as diseases with unknown pathogenic mechanisms and no established treatments. Australia considers diseases rare if they affect fewer than 2,000 individuals, regardless of curability [
7]. In Korea, rare diseases are defined as conditions affecting fewer than 20,000 individuals, or where the number of patients is unknown due to diagnostic difficulty. Additionally, ultra-rare diseases refer to those with specific diagnostic criteria and either fewer than 200 affected individuals or no designated Korean Standard Classification of Diseases (KCD) code. Newly identified chromosomal abnormalities are also included under rare diseases if they lack a specific KCD code and can be classified as diseases rather than symptoms [
8].
The enactment of the Rare Disease Management Act in December 2015 established an official definition of rare diseases in Korea and led to the creation of a nationally managed list. This laid the foundation for statistical evaluation and policy development [
6]. Within this framework, a registration and monitoring program was launched, resulting in the annual publication of the annual report on the rare disease patients in Korea. This report provides essential data on incidence (newly registered patients), mortality, and healthcare utilization [
8]. However, systematic studies on the prevalence of rare diseases remain limited both domestically and internationally. One of the few resources available is the Orphanet database, coordinated by the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) and involving 40 European countries [
9].
This study was prompted by the establishment of the Jeju Regional Center for Rare Diseases in February 2021 [
10] and addressed the urgent need to investigate the epidemiological landscape of rare diseases in the region. The primary objective of this study was to generate foundational data on the prevalence of rare diseases in Jeju, thereby contributing to evidence-based policymaking.
DISCUSSION
This is the first population-based study to examine the prevalence of all rare diseases in Jeju using data from the customized database provided by the NHIS. We estimated the total number of patients diagnosed with rare diseases and identified 4,669 cases in 2021. Of these, 2,083 (44.6%) were male and 2,586 (55.4%) were female. In adults (≥19 years), females showed a higher crude prevalence rate (male-to-female ratio, 100:133), whereas in children (≤18 years), males were more prevalent (134:100). We estimated that the crude prevalence rate of all rare diseases in Jeju was 696 cases per 100,000 people, with 619 per 100,000 among males and 774 per 100,000 among females in 2021.
Although several studies in Korea have reported the prevalence of specific rare diseases [
13-
16], this is the first study to examine the overall prevalence of all rare diseases within a defined region. The lack of comparable studies makes it difficult to assess the relative significance of our findings. Nevertheless, this study offers meaningful empirical data that the Jeju Regional Center for Rare Diseases mandates to monitor and utilize.
This study did not include clinical diagnostic criteria or detailed disease characteristics, which may raise concerns regarding the potential misclassification of diagnoses. However, as this study used rare disease exemption codes designated through the national program, it is likely that diagnostic accuracy was relatively high, supporting the reliability of the results. Nevertheless, the study only included patients who were registered in the co-payment reduction program; therefore, it is possible that some cases were not captured, leading to an underestimation of the actual prevalence [
8].
While the co-payment reduction program offers financial benefits that generally encourage accurate disease coding, there may still be instances in which rare diseases are under-coded. This could occur due to delays in receiving a confirmed diagnosis, administrative mistakes, or incomplete documentation in clinical records. Therefore, even with the use of exemption codes, the possibility of under-coding cannot be completely excluded.
Beyond the data-related limitations, this study highlights a critical aspect of patient vulnerability, namely the socioeconomic disadvantage of individuals living with rare diseases. In this study, the proportion of patients with rare diseases receiving medical aid was 6.0%, much higher than the proportion of recipients of National Basic Livelihood Security (30,634/670,992, 4.6%) in Jeju in the same year [
17]. This proportion was 4.2% among children and 6.4% among adults, indicating a higher level of economic vulnerability in the adult population. These findings suggest that individuals with rare diseases may be more economically disadvantaged than the general population and that this vulnerability becomes more pronounced with age in Jeju.
Previous national statistics from 2019 to 2022 consistently reported that the proportion of male patients with newly diagnosed rare diseases was slightly higher than that of female patients [
18-
22]. In contrast, our analysis, which focused on prevalence, showed that the overall proportion of female patients was higher. Male patients were more common only among individuals aged 18 years or younger. This difference may reflect the cumulative nature of the prevalence data, which include all existing patients rather than just new cases, and may be influenced by differences in survival rates and other epidemiological factors. It may also be partly explained by the slightly higher number of male births in Korea compared with female births (105.0 in 2024) [
23].
The discrepancy between the number of rare diseases listed in the MOHW notification and those identified in the NHIS data is mainly due to structural differences in classification and data recording systems. The number of officially announced diseases by the MOHW tends to increase annually (926 diseases in 2019 [
17], 1,014 in 2020 [
18,
19], 1,086 in 2021 [
20], and 1,123 in 2022 [
21]) and includes conditions that are differentiated by assigning additional serial numbers to a single disease code [
8]. However, the NHIS dataset does not include these serial numbers, resulting in multiple rare diseases sharing a single disease code. Moreover, ultra-rare diseases are grouped under the exemption code V900; however, some share one code among several conditions, whereas others are represented by multiple codes per disease. In certain cases, especially those classified under the syndrome classification guideline, the absence of a specific disease code makes identification impossible. These system-level characteristics explain the substantial discrepancy in the number of all rare diseases recognized by the two sources.
Interestingly, despite the difference in the total disease counts, the proportional distribution of rare diseases (except for ultra-rare diseases and other chromosomal abnormalities), ultra-rare diseases, and other chromosomal abnormalities was similar in both datasets, at approximately 75%, 25%, and less than 5%, respectively (
Table 5). However, when comparing the rare diseases identifiable in the NHIS data with those observed in Jeju, differences were noted in the proportion of disease types. While the NHIS data showed a composition of approximately 73% of rare diseases, 25% of ultra-rare diseases, and 1% of other chromosomal abnormalities, the corresponding proportions in Jeju were 89%, 10%, and 0%, respectively. This suggests that the rarer the disease, the less likely it is to be represented in Jeju, likely due to the region’s small population, which accounts for only 1.3% of the national population. Therefore, the prevalence of extremely rare diseases in Jeju may be disproportionately lower than in larger regions on the mainland.
Among the identifiable rare diseases in the NHIS data, the proportion of diseases with at least one case in Jeju in 2021 was approximately 44%. Specifically, the proportions were 53% for rare diseases (excluding ultra-rare diseases and other chromosomal abnormalities), 18% for ultra-rare diseases, and 11% for other chromosomal abnormalities (
Table 5). These findings suggest that the rarer the disease, the smaller its observed patient population, reflecting the challenges of detecting ultra-rare conditions in smaller regional populations.
Some patients were diagnosed with more than one rare disease, leading to the total number of prevalent cases by disease (
Table 6) slightly exceeding the total number of individual patients with rare diseases (
Tables 1,
2). This distinction is important when interpreting disease-specific prevalence, as it prevents an overestimation of the affected population.
This study had some inherent limitations. The analysis was based on the NHIS claims data [
24], which are primarily collected for administrative and reimbursement purposes rather than research. Therefore, the potential for misclassification, diagnostic inaccuracies, and under-coding cannot be excluded, particularly for rare or underdiagnosed conditions. Despite these limitations, repeated prevalence surveys are a practical approach to monitor trends and guide policies for rare diseases, especially when conducted using population-level datasets [
25]. Future studies should incorporate healthcare utilization and cost analysis to better inform evidence-based policies and resource allocation.
By utilizing the NHIS database and developing a systematic classification framework for the prevalence status, this study quantitatively analyzed the prevalence of rare diseases at the regional level. Based on this foundation, future research should include other regions and multicenter comparisons to validate and generalize the findings of this study. Furthermore, repeated prevalence studies within specific regions are necessary to monitor trends over time.
The findings of this study provide critical baseline data that can inform region-specific public health strategies for the management of rare diseases. Identifying local prevalence patterns by age, sex, and disease type allows policy-makers to prioritize resource allocation, enhance early diagnosis programs, and design tailored patient support services.
Compared to previous national reports (annual reports on patients with rare diseases) in Korea, which primarily focused on newly registered patients with rare diseases, this study analyzed the overall prevalence of rare diseases among all the registered patients, thereby offering a broader understanding of the regional burden of rare diseases. International efforts, such as Orphanet, have emphasized the necessity of region-specific surveillance of rare diseases, and our findings align with the growing need for localized epidemiological assessments to guide policy development.
In addition to the general limitations of the administrative data, the rare disease registration system (co-payment reduction program) presents structural limitations that may have resulted in an underestimation of the true prevalence reported in this study. Patients who have not received a diagnosis or who fail to complete mandatory re-registration every five years may be missed. Moreover, inaccuracies in disease coding within administrative datasets cannot be entirely ruled out.
This study is the first to report the overall crude prevalence rate of rare diseases in the Jeju region using a customized research database from the NHIS. The findings revealed the regional characteristics in prevalence by sex, age, and eligibility type. Due to Jeju’s small population size, the rarer the disease, the less likely it is to be observed. These findings provide important baseline data for regional surveillance of rare diseases and policy planning. Moreover, they underscore the importance of region-specific surveillance and can serve as a cornerstone for tailoring rare disease management strategies in geographically distinct populations, such as Jeju.