J Med Life Sci > Volume 22(3); 2025 > Article
Kong and Song: Sex and age differences in depressive symptoms among older adults in Jeju, Korea: an analysis of the 2017 Community Health Survey data

Abstract

This study investigated sex- and age-related differences in socioeconomic status, health, and mental well-being, focusing on depressive symptoms, among older adults in Jeju, Korea. We analyzed 1,471 participants, aged 65 years, from the 2017 Community Health Survey. The independent variables included socioeconomic, health, and mental health characteristics. The dependent variable, having depressive symptoms, was a binary variable created based on responses to the nine items of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Complex sample analyses included t-tests, Rao-Scott chi-square tests, and logistic regressions. Women in both age groups were more socioeconomically vulnerable than men, with lower educational levels, higher rates of living without a spouse, and greater food insecurity. Arthritis was also more prevalent in women. Moreover, women had shorter sleep durations and were more vulnerable to depressive symptoms, although statistical significance was found in only 50% of women. These sex differences largely plateaued in the late elderly. Conversely, late-elderly men appeared to have more depressive symptoms than early elderly men. For women, belonging to the late elderly group was associated with a lower likelihood of having depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.98; P=0.041). Interestingly, chewing discomfort is a significant risk factor among women. No significantly associated factors were identified in men. In conclusion, while older women showed greater vulnerability, lower-than-expected depressive symptoms in late elderly women suggest resilience. Interventions should be tailored to distinct subgroup risks, particularly in resource-limited settings.

INTRODUCTION

Korea has experienced rapid population aging, with older adults representing a significant proportion of its population. Jeju Province is no exception, with older adults accounting for 19.0% of the population at the end of 2024 [1]. Jeju Province is on the verge of becoming a super-aged society, as this proportion is expected to exceed 20.0% soon. As the elderly population increases, understanding their health challenges is an increasingly important public health concern.
Older women are more vulnerable than their male counterparts because of their longer life expectancy, lower socioeconomic status, and disparities in access to financial and healthcare resources. Many women outlive their spouses, experience economic hardship, and have limited social support, elevating their risks of poor physical and mental health outcomes [2-5]. Of these, depression is particularly concerning. Women tend to experience depressive symptoms at nearly twice the rate of men throughout their lifespan [6-8]. In rural areas, such as Jeju, geographic and economic factors may further exacerbate these challenges [9-11].
Despite these well-documented vulnerabilities, sex differences in aging and mental health remain insufficiently explored [12,13], particularly in population-based studies. Existing studies often treat older adults as a homogeneous group, failing to capture the distinct differences between men and women, or between different age subgroups.
This study examined the health status and mental well-being of older adults in Jeju, Korea, focusing on sex- and age-related differences, with a particular focus on depressive symptoms. By identifying sex differences in the factors associated with depressive symptoms in older adults in Jeju, this study aimed to provide insights to inform more tailored interventions.

METHODS

1. Study population and data source

The Community Health Survey (CHS) has provided regional statistics on the health of adults aged 19 years and over since 2008. The survey population focuses on adults living in residential housing (stratification variable: apartment, general housing) at each sampling point in Tong/Ban/Ri at the time of the survey.
Raw data from the 2017 CHS were used in this study [14]. Among the 5,043 adults surveyed in Jeju Province, individuals aged under 65 years were excluded, resulting in 1,558 older adults. Subsequently, cases with incomplete information (responding ‘don’t know’ or ‘refused to answer’ for key variables, such as education, marital status, economic status, economic activity, dietary condition, and mental health) were excluded. Education is an important variable that is frequently used to measure socioeconomic status in epidemiological studies or health equity studies. Moreover, a known relationship exists between educational level and academic background, and health [15]. The final analysis included 1,471 older adults (606 men and 865 women). Participants were classified into early elderly (65-74 years) and late elderly (≥75 years) groups (Fig. 1).
This study was exempt from Institutional Review Board review (2025-03-016) as it analyzed secondary data from the CHS. The dataset did not include private information, such as patient name, social security number, address, or phone number. Only non-identifiable results were released and made openly available for public research purposes.

2. Assessment

All assessment tools used in this study were derived from the 2017 CHS. The tools are as follows [14].

1) Socioeconomic status

The variables representing socioeconomic status in the Jeju regional CHS included residence, marital status, education level, economic activity, economically vulnerable status, and dietary conditions. Residence was classified into two categories: urban area (Dong area) and rural area (Eup or Myoun area). Marital status was categorized as living with a spouse or not having a spouse (bereaved, divorced, or single individuals). Educational level was classified as no formal education, village school, elementary school, middle school, high school, university, or higher. Economic activity was grouped into employed and unemployed. Economic vulnerability was determined based on whether the individual was a recipient of basic livelihood support. Dietary conditions were assessed based on the household food security status. Household food security was evaluated using the following four response options: 1) My family members could eat a sufficient quantity and variety of foods as desired; 2) My family members could eat a sufficient quantity of food but not a variety of foods; 3) Due to financial difficulties, we sometimes did not have enough to eat; and 4) Due to financial difficulties, we often did not have enough to eat.

2) Health status

Disease prevalence was assessed by asking whether the respondent had experienced any illness or discomfort due to chronic or acute diseases, accidents, or poisoning within the past 2 weeks. Participants were also asked if they had ever been diagnosed by a physician with chronic conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia (including hyperlipidemia), or osteoarthritis, and whether they were currently receiving treatment for these conditions. Additionally, participants were asked about the following health-related experiences: chewing discomfort (difficulty or discomfort when chewing food due to dental-, denture-, or gum-related issues), fall accidents (incidents of slipping, tripping, collapsing, or falling within the past year), and bedridden conditions (a state requiring the participant to remain in bed for most of the day due to illness or injury within the past month).

3) Mental health status

Sleep duration was measured by asking the participants to report their average daily sleep time. Subjective stress levels were assessed using a single question regarding the extent to which the participants generally felt stressed. Responses were ‘feel very much’, ‘feel a lot’, ’feel a little’, and ‘hardly feel it.’
Nine depressive mood items from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were assessed by asking, over the past 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by the following nine symptoms? Responses to each item were categorized as follows: presence of the symptom (several days, more than a week, or almost every day), absence of the symptom (never), and clinically significant depression was defined according to the CHS raw data guidelines, using a PHQ-9 total score of 10 or higher as the cutoff [14]. Based on the responses to the nine items, a binary variable, having depressive symptoms (depressive symptom prevalence), was created. Participants who reported experiencing at least one of the nine symptoms were classified as having depressive symptoms, while those who reported none of the symptoms were classified as not having depressive symptoms. The nine depressive symptoms assessed were as follows. 1) Little interest or pleasure in doing things (loss of interest in activities). 2) Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless (depressed mood, hopelessness). 3) Trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or sleeping too much (sleep disturbance). 4) Feeling tired or having little energy (fatigue). 5) Poor appetite or overeating (eating disturbance). 6) Feeling bad about oneself, feeling like a failure, or feeling that one has let down oneself or their family (feelings of worthlessness). 7) Trouble concentrating on tasks, such as reading the newspaper or watching television (difficulty concentrating). 8) Moving or speaking so slowly that others notice, or, conversely, feeling so restless that it is noticeable to others (psychomotor changes). 9) Thoughts of being better off dead, or thoughts of self-harm in any way (suicidal ideation). Suicidal ideation was assessed by asking whether the participants had experienced thoughts of death or self-harm.

3. Statistical analyses

A complex sample design (stratification, clustering, and weighting) was applied to the analysis to ensure that the findings could be generalized to a population of 93,858 individuals aged 65 years and older in Jeju Province. Analyses were conducted within the framework of comparing socioeconomic status, physical health, and mental health characteristics according to age and sex. Rao-Scott chi-square tests and t-tests were used for univariate analyses. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine factors associated with depressive symptoms. The model demonstrated statistical significance, and the global null hypothesis (BETA=0) was rejected (P<0.001). All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

The average age of older adults in Jeju was 69.3±0.19 years for men and 69.9±0.19 years for women in the early elderly group (65-74 years), and 79.9±0.48 years for men and 80.6±0.27 years for women in the late elderly group (≥75 years).

1. Socioeconomic challenges among elderly women in Jeju

In the early elderly group, 60.7% of men and 69.3% of women lived in urban areas. However, in the late elderly group, this pattern was reversed (63.6% for men and 46.8% for women), indicating that the proportion of elderly male residents surpassed that of elderly female residents.
The proportion of elderly women living with their spouses was significantly lower than that of elderly men. Among men, the spousal cohabitation rate was 92.1% in the early elderly group and 87.9% in the late-elderly group. In contrast, among women, the rate was markedly lower, at 68.3% in the early elderly group and 37.1% in the late-elderly group.
The proportion of elderly women with no formal education who attended traditional village schools (Seodang) or classical Chinese education was significantly higher than that of elderly men. Among women, this proportion was 17.1% in the early elderly group, increasing to 47.3% in the late elderly group. Among men, this was 2.6% and 4.9% in the early and late elderly groups, respectively.
The proportion of individuals engaged in economic activity (employed) was significantly higher in men (67.6%) compared to women (48.5%) in the early elderly group. In the late elderly group, the proportion decreased in both men (33.5%) and women (32.1%) and the difference between the two groups was no longer statistically significant.
Moreover, the proportion of basic livelihood recipients (classified by whether they were economically vulnerable or not) in the early elderly group did not differ significantly between men and women. However, in the late-elderly group, women were significantly more vulnerable. Household food security status followed the same pattern as the variable, basic livelihood recipients (Table 1).

2. Physical health challenges in elderly women in Jeju

The proportion of individuals who experienced illness in the past 2 weeks was significantly higher in men (23.7%) than in women (14.0%) in the late elderly group. The proportion of men diagnosed with diabetes was significantly higher than that of women. In the early elderly group, the prevalence was 23.3% in men and 15.6% in women, while in the late elderly group, it was 29.5% in men and 16.3% in women. Similarly, the proportion of individuals currently receiving treatment for diabetes was also significantly higher in men, with 22.5% of men and 14.6% of women in the early elderly group, and 18.5% of men and 15.9% of women in the late elderly group.
In contrast, the prevalence of dyslipidemia (including hyperlipidemia) was significantly higher in women than in men, but only in the early elderly group (26.4% in men and 39.9% in women). Similarly, the proportion of those currently receiving treatment was 20.6% in men and 31.5% in women in the late elderly group. Likewise, the prevalence of arthritis was significantly higher among women in all comparisons. In the early age group, arthritis affected 20.2% of men and 48.0% of women, whereas in the late-age group, 23.7% of men and 55.0% of women were affected. The proportion of individuals on current treatment was also significantly higher in women (10.8% of men and 34.4% of women in the early elderly group, and 20.7% of men and 38.6% of women in the late elderly group).
Experiences of chewing discomfort and fall accident did not differ significantly between the two sexes in the early and late elderly groups. However, approximately one in three individuals in the early elderly group and one in two individuals in the late-elderly group experienced chewing discomfort, indicating that its prevalence increased with age. The prevalence of fall accidents and being bedridden was higher in women than in men in both age groups. Notably, the prevalence of most health-related variables was higher in the late-elderly group than in the early elderly group (Table 2).

3. Mental health stability among late elderly women in Jeju

The average sleep duration was significantly shorter in women than in men (Table 3). The average daily sleep duration was 6.5 hours (standard error [SE], 0.10) for men and 6.1 hours (SE, 0.11) for women in the early elderly group, and 6.5 hours (SE, 0.12) for men and 6.2 hours (SE, 0.09) for women in the late elderly group.
The response distribution for subjective stress levels showed that elderly women experienced higher levels of stress than elderly men in the early elderly group. However, no significant difference was observed between sexes in either age group.
Although the results of the comparison by sex did not reach statistical significance in the early elderly group, the prevalence of depressive mood was 4.2% in men and 7.9% in women, whereas the prevalence of clinically significant depression was 1.4% in men and 2.8% in women. Similarly, in the late-elderly group, depressive mood remained more prevalent in women (4.5% in men vs. 6.0% in women). Notably, the prevalence of clinically significant depression was reversed between sexes, with higher rates observed in men (4.6%) than in women (3.3%).
Depressive symptoms were most commonly observed in the following order: fatigue, sleep disturbances, depressed mood/hopelessness, eating disturbances, and loss of interest in activities. In contrast, feelings of unhappiness, self-deprecating thoughts, anxious behavior, and difficulty in concentrating were relatively less common. In the early elderly group, symptoms, such as loss of interest in activities, depressed mood/hopelessness, sleep disturbance, and fatigue, were significantly more common in women than in men. Additionally, suicidal ideation was more common in women than men in both age groups, although with no significant differences (Table 3).
When comparing the early and late elderly groups among elderly men, almost all depressive symptoms were more prevalent in the late elderly group than in the early elderly group, with two symptoms (depressed mood/hopelessness and eating disturbance) showing statistically significant increases. Conversely, among women, six of the nine depressive symptoms improved, and three of these improvements (loss of interest in activities, depressed mood/hopelessness, and sleep disturbance) were statistically significant (Table 4).

4. Sex differences in factors associated with having depressive symptoms among older adults in Jeju

Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with depressive symptoms in elderly women and men. Adjustments were made for age (late elderly group), low educational level (no formal education), marital status (widowed, divorced, single), low economic status (basic livelihood security recipient), place of residence (urban), and physical health conditions (diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hyperlipidemia, arthritis, and chewing discomfort).
Among women, those belonging to the late elderly group showed a significant protective association against depressive symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.98; P=0.041). Conversely, chewing discomfort (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.10-2.52, P=0.016) was identified as a significant risk factor for depressive symptoms. In contrast, no significant association was found among elderly men (Table 5).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the socioeconomic status, health, and mental well-being of older adults in Jeju, Korea, by analyzing sex- and age-related differences, with a particular focus on depressive symptoms. The findings confirmed that older women were more vulnerable than men across multiple dimensions, including socioeconomic status (e.g., living in urban rather than rural areas, living without a spouse, lower educational attainment, lower labor force participation, and greater food insecurity), physical health (e.g., dyslipidemia and arthritis), and mental health (e.g., shorter sleep duration and depressive symptoms; see Tables 1-3 for descriptive differences by sex and age group). These examples reflect patterns observed in the descriptive statistics and are not intended to represent statistically significant associations in a multivariable analysis. Contrary to expectations, late-old women did not exhibit the highest levels of depressive symptoms. Instead, their symptoms were comparable to those of early aged women and seemed to be even better than those of late elderly men, who showed significantly higher depressive symptoms. These results suggest that resilience may play a role in mitigating mental health decline among late elderly women, despite their greater vulnerability.
Our findings are consistent with the results of previous research, indicating that older women generally face greater socioeconomic and physical health vulnerabilities than men, including lower educational attainment, higher economic insecurity, and a higher prevalence of chronic conditions, such as arthritis and chewing discomfort [16-18].
Many studies have consistently reported that women across all ages are at a higher risk for depressive symptoms than men [6,7]. A key novel aspect of this study is the unexpected pattern observed among late elderly women. In particular, among late elderly women, depressive symptoms were not significantly higher than those of early elderly women and were lower than those of late elderly men. After adjusting for marital status, education, place of residence, economic status, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, arthritis, and chewing difficulties, being in the late elderly age group was identified as a significant protective factor against depressive symptoms (aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P=0.041) only among women. Women had the only risk factor of shewing discomfort (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.52; P=0.016).
Previous studies have reported mixed findings regarding the relationship between aging, sex, and mental health. Some studies have suggested that the accumulation of social and physical disadvantages over time leads to worsened mental health in older women [8,9,19]. However, other studies have found that older adults may demonstrate psychological resilience, contributing to the maintenance of better mental well-being despite increasing vulnerabilities [20-23]. A nationwide register-based cohort study in Sweden compared the standardized incidence rate of clinically diagnosed psychiatric disorders between men and women across the lifespan. While depressive disorders were higher in women across all age groups, this sex difference disappeared after 80 years of age. Similarly, anxiety disorders, which are known to have a higher incidence in women across all age groups, were similar in both men and women after mid-50s, and stress-related disorders after 80 years did not demonstrate a significant sex difference [24].
Our study provides empirical evidence supporting the latter perspective. In particular, among late elderly women, our results suggest that resilience mechanisms may buffer against the observed higher levels of depressive symptoms in men despite the vulnerability of late elderly women.
Another important result of this study is that the factors associated with depressive symptoms among older adults in Jeju, Korea differed between different sex and age groups. Given that different population subgroups encounter distinct risk factors, interventions should be tailored and prioritized accordingly, particularly in resource-limited settings [12].
One limitation of this cross-sectional observational study is that the findings related to late elderly women cannot be interpreted causally in terms of reducing depressive symptoms. However, despite adjusting for socioeconomic and physical health factors associated with depressive symptoms, a significant protective effect in late elderly women remained. We hypothesized a potential explanation for this finding.
First, late elderly women may experience a reduction in and simplification of their social roles. Adapting to these changes may effectively alleviate depressive symptoms [25]. Late elderly women (75 years and older) may have already been freed from the burden of caregiving, such as losing a spouse or having independent children. Research suggests that women’s vulnerability to depression is not due to a lack of coping ability or social support compared to men, but rather, because women tend to be more emotionally involved in the lives of others, leading to greater emotional costs, which contribute to higher stress and suffering [26]. In the late elderly time of life, women’s emotional investments in important individuals may be more limited. Consequently, the incidence of depressive symptoms in late elderly women also lowers. Several studies have highlighted that women tend to be more emotionally affected by others’ lives. Research indicates that women are more psychosocially flexible and tend to react more sensitively to situations by utilizing both problem- and emotion-focused coping strategies more effectively [27]. These characteristics may positively impact the reduction in depressive symptoms. In contrast, older elderly men may experience increased loneliness and social isolation following the death of their spouse, which could contribute to higher depressive symptoms. This finding has been reported to show a stronger association among depressive symptoms, disabilities, and mortality in men than in women [28].
Second, late elderly women seem to maintain a sense of self-control in the face of the natural health decline associated with aging. Research has shown that an increased sense of self-control leads to greater subjective well-being [29] and life satisfaction [30], and even elderly individuals in long-term care facilities can regain autonomy [31]. Mental health outcomes do not consistently align with these risks, suggesting the potential role of resilience. Among aging populations, resilience has been conceptualized as the process of adapting to challenges through individual and social resources. Resilience refers to the ability to maintain or recover mental well-being despite adversity [32,33]. Studies indicate that resilience can buffer the negative effects of stress and protect against mental health deterioration [34,35].
This study focused on a local culture unique to Jeju Province in Korea. As such, our results may not be generalizable to other populations. Further research in other populations is required to verify the generalizability of our findings.
One of the study’s strengths is its population-based approach, which enables a more representative analysis of older adults than studies that rely on clinical or convenience samples. Additionally, by differentiating between early and late elderly age groups, this study provided a more nuanced understanding of mental health outcomes in older women, a factor often overlooked in previous research. Furthermore, the use of a comparative framework that included men and women offered valuable insights into sex-based disparities and highlights, in particular, how mental health outcomes differ between men and women across various early and late elderly age groups. Our findings underscore the need for longitudinal studies that can account for temporal associations and causality alongside repeated cross-sectional studies that explore descriptive statistics from continuous observations.
This study highlighted the vulnerability and potential resilience among the elderly living in Jeju. The finding that late elderly women did not experience the expected increase in depressive symptoms challenges the assumption that accumulated disadvantages lead to worsened mental health. A previous meta-analysis of 300 studies suggested that women are less happy or satisfied than men at all ages, with this gap widening after middle age [36]. In contrast, our findings raised the possibility that older women may maintain or experience better mental health as they enter the late elderly stage of life. However, this interpretation warrants cautious consideration. Further longitudinal research is required to explore the hypothesis that resilience strengthens with advancing age among older adults. Interventions informed by these findings are crucial for shaping targeted strategies. Importantly, intentions should focus on risk reduction, as well as reinforce resilience factors among elderly women.
This study found that although elderly women in Jeju, Korea, exhibited greater socioeconomic and physical health vulnerabilities, yet late elderly women showed lower than expected levels of depressive symptoms. Additionally, difficulty chewing was associated with depressive symptoms in women. In elderly men, no risk factors for depressive symptoms were identified. Notably, being in the late elderly stage of life was protective against depressive symptoms. Overall, given the distinct risk factors faced by different population subgroups, interventions should be tailored and prioritized accordingly, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author reports no conflict of interest.

FUNDING

None.

Figure 1.
Flowchart of older adults included for analyses.
jmls-2025-05-09f1.jpg
Table 1.
Complex sample analysis of socioeconomic status by sex in early and late elderly groups in Jeju
Characteristic Early elderly (65-74 years)
Late elderly (75 years old or older)
Men (n=21,591) Women (n=32,216) P-value Men (n=16,860) Women (n=23,191) P-value
Residence
 Urban area 13,113 (60.7) 22,341 (69.3) 0.006 10,725 (63.6) 10,852 (46.8) <0.001
 Rural area 8,478 (39.3) 9,876 (30.7) 6,135 (36.4) 12 339 (53.2)
Marital status
 Married 19,884 (92.1) 21,988 (68.3) <0.001 14,824 (87.9) 8,599 (37.1) <0.001
 Without spouse* 1,707 (7.9) 10,229 (31.7) 2,036 (12.1) 14,592 (62.9)
Education status
 No education 566 (2.6) 5,511 (17.1) <0.001 835 (4.9) 10,964 (47.3) <0.001
 Elementary school 3,152 (14.6) 14,631 (45.4) 2,905 (17.2) 8 858 (38.2)
 Middle school 5,108 (23.7) 6,720 (20.9) 5,364 (31.8) 1,561 (6.7)
 High school 9,385 (43.5) 4,066 (12.6) 4,602 (27.3) 1,026(4.4)
 University or higher 3,380 (15.7) 1,288 (4.0) 3,154 (18.7) 782 (3.4)
Whether or not economically active
 Employed state 14,596 (67.6) 15,630 (48.5) <0.001 5.652 (33.5) 7 446 (32.1) 0.793
Low economic status
 Basic livelihood recipients 997 (4.6) 1,956 (6.1) 0.498 1,009 (6.0) 2,596 (11.2) 0.009
Dietary conditions
 Sufficient in both quality and quantity 14,807 (68.6) 21,407 (66.4) 0.542 10,796 (64.0) 10,227 (44.1) <0.001
 Just sufficient quantity 6,562 (30.4) 9,839 (30.5) 5,709 (33.9) 11,400 (49.29)
 Often insufficient 221 (1.0) 917 (2.8) 332 (2.0) 1,327 (5.7)
 Frequent insufficient 0 (0.0) 53 (0.2) 22 (0.1) 237 (1.0)

Values are presented as number (%).

* Without spouse means bereavement, divorced, seperated, or single.

Table 2.
Complex sample analysis of health status by sex in early and late elderly groups in Jeju
Characteristic Early elderly (65-74 years)
Late elderly (75 years old or older)
Men (n=21,591) Women (n=32,216) P-value Men (n=16,860) Women (n=23,191) P-value
Experience of illness in the past 2 weeks 1,929 (8.9) 3,355 (10.4) 0.478 2,358 (14.0) 5,508 (23.7) 0.008
Hypertension
 Past diagnostic history 11,680 (54.1) 17,205 (53.4) 0.907 10,647 (63.2) 13,864 (59.8) 0.508
 Currently receiving treatment 11,200 (51.9) 16,427 (51.0) 0.882 10,377 (61.5) 13,560 (58.5) 0.552
Diabetes
 Past diagnostic history 5.040 (23.3) 5,019 (15.6) 0.032 4,966 (29.5) 3,791 (16.3) 0.003
 Currently receiving treatment 4,866 (22.5) 4,690 (14.6) 0.028 4,543 (26.9) 3,502 (15.1) 0.005
Dyslipidemia
 Past diagnostic history 5,692 (26.4) 12,858 (39.9) 0.004 3,547 (21.0) 4,136 (17.8) 0.389
 Currently receiving treatment 4,448 (20.6) 10,162 (31.5) 0.007 3,125 (18.5) 3,684 (15.9) 0.435
Arthritis
 Past diagnostic history 4,355 (20.2) 15,453 (48.0) <0.001 3,995 (23.7) 12,756 (55.0) <0.001
 Currently receiving treatment 2,341 (10.8) 11,067 (34.4) <0.001 3,496 (20.7) 8,958 (38,6) <0.001
Chewing discomfort experience 7,627 (35.3) 9,890 (30.7) 0.312 8,293 (49.2) 9,035 (39.0) 0.048
Fall accident 2,454 (11.4) 5,620 (17.4) 0.060 3,133 (18.6) 5,412 (23.3) 0.391
Bedridden condition 865 (4.0) 2,171 (6.7) 0.227 1,295 (7.7) 2,566 (11.1) 0.263

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 3.
Complex sample analysis of mental health status by sex in early and late elderly groups in Jeju
Characteristic Early elderly (65-74 years)
Late elderly (75 years old or older)
Men (n=21,591) Women (n=32,216) P-value Men (n=16,860) Women (n=23,191) P-value
Sleep duration 6.5±0.10 6.1±0.11 <0.001 6.5±0.12 6.2±0.09 <0.001
Subjective stress level 0.192 0.358
 Feel very much 465 (2.2) 754 (2.3) 306 (1.8) 766 (3.3)
 Feel it a lot 3,309 (15.3) 6,829 (21.2) 2,231 (13.2) 4,278 (18.4)
 Feel it a little 10,118 (46.9) 15,957 (49.5) 8,019 (47.6) 9,372 (40.4)
 Hardly feel it 7,699 (35.7) 8,677 (26.9) 6,304 (37.4) 8,775 (37.8)
Depressive mood 909 (4.2) 2,544 (7.9) 0.163 751 (4.5) 1,380 (6.0) 0.461
Clinically significant depression 299 (1.4) 917 (2.8) 0.213 775 (4.6) 773 (3.3) 0.630
 Loss of interest in work 2,991 (13.9) 8,965 (27.8) 0.003 3,695 (21.9) 2,668 (11.5) 0.003
 Depression, hopelessness 2,720 (12.6) 9,796 (30.4) <0.001 3,888 (23.1) 4,549 (19.6) 0.501
 Sleep disturbance 5,080 (23.5) 14,555 (45.2) <0.001 5,590 (33.2) 8,063 (34.8) 0.709
 Fatigue 6,747 (31.2) 14,150 (43.9) 0.034 6,713 (39.8) 8,148 (35.1) 0.284
 Eating disorder 2,825 (13.1) 4,703 (14.6) 0.650 4,067 (24.1) 4,487 (19.3) 0.350
 Unhappiness 1,217 (5.6) 3,272 (10.2) 0.201 1,865 (11.1) 1,925 (8.3) 0.440
 Difficulty concentrating 1,271 (5.9) 1,870 (5.8) 0.976 957 (5.7) 1,749 (7.5) 0.443
 Anxious behavior 725 (3.4) 2,094 (6.5) 0.308 1,205 (7.1) 1,006 (4.3) 0.091
 Self-deprecation 1,020 (4.7) 2,243 (7.0) 0.432 1,492 (8.8) 2,056 (8.9) 0.994
Suicidal ideation 1,185 (5.5) 3,185 (9.9) 0.086 1,502 (8.9) 2,568 (11.1) 0.460

Values are presented as hours±standard error or number (%).

Table 4.
Comparison of depressive symptom prevalence between early and late elderly groups by sex in Jeju (complex sample design)
Depressive symptom Men
Women
Early elderly (65-74 years) Late elderly (≥75 years) P-value Early elderly (65-74 years) Late elderly (≥75 years) P-value
Loss of interest in activities 2,991 (13.9) 3,695 (21.9) 0.094 8,965 (27.8) 2,668 (11.5) <0.001
Depressed mood/hopelessness 2,720 (12.6) 3,888 (23.1) 0.027 9,796 (30.4) 4,549 (19.6) 0.008
Sleep disturbance 5,080 (23.5) 5,590 (33.2) 0.062 14,555 (45.2) 8,063 (34.8) 0.027
Fatigue 6,747 (31.2) 6,713 (39.8) 0.173 14,150 (43.9) 8,148 (35.1) 0.070
Eating disturbance 2,825 (13.1) 4,067 (24.1) 0.008 4,703 (14.6) 4,487 (19.3) 0.100
Feelings of unhappiness 1,217 (5.6) 1,865 (11.1) 0.115 3,272 (10.2) 1,925 (8.3) 0.515
Difficulty concentrating 1,271 (5.9) 957 (5.7) 0.934 1,870 (5.8) 1,749 (7.5) 0.437
Anxious behavior 725 (3.4) 1,205 (7.1) 0.152 2,094 (6.5) 1,006 (4.3) 0.399
Self-deprecation 1,020 (4.7) 1,492 (8.8) 0.116 2,243 (7.0) 2,056 (8.9) 0.530

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 5.
Logistic regression results for men and women using a complex sample design
Characteristic Women
Men
aOR (95% CI) P-value aOR (95% CI) P-value
Aging level
 The elderly, early (65-74 years) 1.00 1.00
 The elderly, later (≥75 years) 0.66 (0.45-0.98) 0.041 1.38 (0.85-2.26) 0.192
Marital status
 Married (with spouse) 1.00 1.00
 Widowed/divorced/single 0.77 (0.50-1.18) 0.230 1.31 (0.64-2.69) 0.460
Education
 Ever been in a school 1.00 1.00
 No 0.66 (0.41-1.08) 0.094 1.31 (0.59-2.91) 0.508
Place of residence
 Rural 1.00 1.00
 Urban 1.28 (0.85-1.91) 0.236 1.26 (0.82-1.96) 0. 293
Low economic status
 General 1.00 1.00
 Basic livelihood security recipient 1.64 (0.82-3.29) 0.164 2.02 (0.68-6.05) 0.207
Hypertension
 Normal 1.00 1.00
 Diagnosed 1.26 (0.89-1.78) 0.196 0.92 (0.51-1.68) 0.793
Diabetes mellitus
 Normal 1.00 1.00
 Diagnosed 0.85 (0.43-1.68) 0.631 0.98 (0.53-1.79) 0.934
Dyslipidemia
 Normal 1.00 1.00
 Diagnosed 1.21 (0.80-1.81) 0.362 1.48 (0.82-2.69) 0.196
Arthritis
 Normal 1.00 1.00
 Diagnosed 1.42 (0.95-2.13) 0.083 1.37 (0.68-2.74) 0.373
Chewing difficulties
 Normal 1.00 1.00
 Diagnosed 1.67 (1.10-2.52) 0.016 1.33 (0.81-2.19) 0.252

aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence Interval.

REFERENCES

1. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. Resident registration population statistics. Status of elderly population by administrative district and region [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; c2025 [cited 2025 Feb 13]. Available from: https://jumin.mois.go.kr/etcStatOldAge.do#-none.
2. Lee SH, Han CK. Impacts of assets on subjective physical health among elderly women: focusing on moderating effects of participation in economic activities. J Soc Sci 2020;59:405-48.
crossref
3. Yang S, Choi J. Impact of social activities on healthy life expectancy in Korean older adults: 13-year survival analysis focusing on gender comparison. J Korean Gerontol Soc 2021;41:547-66.
crossref
4. Mehta K, Arega H, Smith NL, Li K, Gause E, Lee J, et al. Gender- based disparities in burn injuries, care and outcomes: a World Health Organization (WHO) Global Burn Registry cohort study. Am J Surg 2022;223:157-63.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Golaszewski NM, LaCroix AZ, Godino JG, Allison MA, Manson JE, King JJ, et al. Evaluation of social isolation, loneliness, and cardiovascular disease among older women in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2146461.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Kuehner C. Why is depression more common among women than among men? Lancet Psychiatry 2017;4:146-58.
crossref pmid
7. Li S, Zhang X, Cai Y, Zheng L, Pang H, Lou L. Sex difference in incidence of major depressive disorder: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2023;22:53.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Kiely KM, Brady B, Byles J. Gender, mental health and ageing. Maturitas 2019;129:76-84.
crossref pmid
9. Lim G, Lee H. The moderating effect of social capital in the relationship between health status and depression of older women living alone in rural areas. Ment Health Soc Work 2022;50:100-22.
crossref
10. Lee SY, Choi YA, Kim MJ. The effect of urban and rural elderly women’s individual characteristics, exercise habit, Korean falls efficacy scale, and perception of fall risk on the self-rated health. JKAPESGW 2021;35:113-26.
crossref
11. Freak-Poli R, Ryan J, Tran T, Owen A, Power JM, Berk M, et al. Social isolation, social support and loneliness as independent concepts, and their relationship with health-related quality of life among older women. Aging Ment Health 2022;26:1335-44.
crossref pmid
12. The Lancet Psychiatry. Sex and gender in psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2016;3:999.
crossref pmid
13. Endo T, Abe T, Morita M, Isomura M. Gender differences in the associations of familial social support on depressive symptoms among older adults in rural Japan: the Shimane CoHRE study. Adv Public Health 2024;2024:9876878.
crossref
14. Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Guidelines for using the 2017 Community Health Survey raw data [Internet]. Cheongju: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency; c2017 [cited 2025 Feb 13]. Available from: https://chs.kdca.go.kr/chs/mnl/mnlBoard-Main.do.
15. Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 1997;18:341-78.
crossref pmid
16. Namkung EH. Effects of accessibility to community resources on self-rated health in older adults: differential effects by individual socioeconomic status. Health Welf 2023;25:7-36.
crossref
17. Kim S, Choi S. The effect of social exclusion change on health change and health inequality of elderly. J Korean Gerontol Soc 2022;42:355-80.
crossref
18. Park HK, Chun SY, Choi Y, Lee SY, Kim SJ, Park EC. Effects of social activity on health-related quality of life according to age and gender: an observational study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015;13:140.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
19. Bowling A, Iliffe S. Psychological approach to successful ageing predicts future quality of life in older adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:1-10.
crossref pmid pmc
20. Verger NB, Urbanowicz A, Shankland R, McAloney-Kocaman K. Coping in isolation: predictors of individual and household risks and resilience against the COVID-19 pandemic. Soc Sci Humanit Open 2021;3:100123.
crossref
21. MacLeod S, Musich S, Hawkins K, Alsgaard K, Wicker ER. The impact of resilience among older adults. Geriatr Nurs 2016;37:266-72.
crossref pmid
22. Netuveli G, Wiggins RD, Montgomery SM, Hildon Z, Blane D. Mental health and resilience at older ages: bouncing back after adversity in the British Household Panel Survey. J Epidemiol Community Health 2008;62:987-91.
crossref pmid
23. Nygren B, Aléx L, Jonsén E, Gustafson Y, Norberg A, Lundman B. Resilience, sense of coherence, purpose in life and self-transcendence in relation to perceived physical and mental health among the oldest old. Aging Ment Health 2005;9:354-62.
crossref pmid
24. Yang Y, Fang F, Arnberg FK, Kuja-Halkola R, D’Onofrio BM, Larsson H, et al. Sex differences in clinically diagnosed psychiatric disorders over the lifespan: a nationwide register-based study in Sweden. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2024;47:101105.
crossref pmid pmc
25. Kiosses DN, Ravdin LD, Gross JJ, Raue P, Kotbi N, Alexopoulos GS. Problem adaptation therapy for older adults with major depression and cognitive impairment: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2015;72:22-30.
crossref pmid pmc
26. Kessler RC, McLeod JD. Sex differences in vulnerability to undesirable life events. Am Sociol Rev 1984;49:620-31.
crossref
27. Cheng C. Assessing coping flexibility in real-life and laboratory settings: a multimethod approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;80:814-33.
crossref pmid
28. Murphy RA, Hagaman AK, Reinders I, Steeves JA, Newman AB, Rubin SM, et al. Depressive trajectories and risk of disability and mortality in older adults: longitudinal findings from the health, aging, and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2016;71:228-35.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Boyce A, Wethington E, Moen P. Continuity and change in subjective well-being. In: Krout JA, Wethington E, editors. Residential choices and experiences of older adults: pathways to life quality. New York: Springer; 2003. pp. 173-93.
30. Onishi C, Yuasa K, Sei M, Ewis AA, Nakano T, Munakata H, et al. Determinants of life satisfaction among Japanese elderly women attending health care and welfare service facilities. J Med Invest 2010;57:69-80.
crossref pmid
31. Groger L. Coming to terms: African-Americans’ complex ways of coping with life in a nursing home. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2002;55:183-205.
crossref pmid pdf
32. Ayed N, Toner S, Priebe S. Conceptualizing resilience in adult mental health literature: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Psychol Psychother 2019;92:299-341.
crossref pmid pdf
33. Hou WK, Tong H, Liang L, Li TW, Liu H, Ben-Ezra M, et al. Probable anxiety and components of psychological resilience amid COVID-19: a population-based study. J Affect Disord 2021;282:594-601.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Gloria CT, Steinhardt MA. Relationships among positive emotions, coping, resilience and mental health. Stress Health 2016;32:145-56.
crossref pmid
35. Hezel DM, Rapp AM, Wheaton MG, Kayser RR, Rose SV, Messner GR, et al. Resilience predicts positive mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Yorkers with and without obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Psychiatr Res 2022;150:165-72.
crossref pmid pmc
36. Pinquart M, Sörensen S. Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age: a meta-analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2001;56:195-213.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 1,112 View
  • 11 Download
ORCID iDs

Mi Hee Kong
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1464-8812

Jung-Kook Song
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-722X

Related articles


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
102, Jejudaehak-ro, Jeju-si, Jeju-do 63243, Republic of Korea
Tel: +82-64-754-8023    E-mail: jmls.jeju@jejunu.ac.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by Jeju National University Institute for Medical Science.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next