Risk factors for blood transfusion after Cesarean section in patients with partial placenta previa

Article information

J Med Life Sci. 2023;20(4):172-177

Publication date (electronic) : 2023 December 31

doi : https://doi.org/10.22730/jmls.2023.20.4.172

Hyun Jung Kim¹, Woo Hee Lim², Young Sun Kim^,3

¹Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Republic of Korea

²Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Republic of Korea

³Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence to Young Sun Kim Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea Tel: 82-2-3010-3868 Fax: 82-2-3010-3113 E-mail: sionyi@naver.com

Received 2023 August 31; Revised 2023 October 16; Accepted 2023 October 16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Placenta previa (PP) is an obstetric condition in which the placenta abnormally implants at the bottom of the uterus with complete or partial coverage of the cervix. PP can be associated with postpartum hemorrhage after Cesarean section (CS), which could induce maternal morbidity and mortality [1-3].

However, many clinicians consider postpartum hemorrhage relatively less common in patients with partial PP than in patients with complete PP [4,5]. Nevertheless, partial PP may trigger postpartum hemorrhage. Clinicians may lack preparation for the reservation of blood supplies, close patient monitoring, and other anesthetic management. Although several previous studies have reported risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage, such as degree of previa, anterior placental position, maternal age, and previous CS, most included both cases with complete PP and partial PP [6-11]. In contrast, few studies have been conducted on patients with partial PP. To address this knowledge gap, this study assessed risk factors for blood transfusion after CS in patients with partial PP.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent CS for partial PP at Jeju National University Hospital between January 2010 and October 2021. This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Jeju National University Hospital (IRB No. 2021-10-013). The IRB waived the requirement for obtaining informed consent.

In this study, twin pregnancies were excluded from the analysis. Because almost all CS procedures were performed by two specific obstetric surgeons, patients who underwent CS by other surgeons were excluded to reduce surgical bias.

The blood transfusion group (group B) was defined as patients who received packed red blood cells (RBCs) during CS or within 24 hours after CS. In contrast, those not receiving packed RBCs were assigned to the non-blood transfusion group (group N). Collected variables for univariable analysis included maternal age, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists’ classification, gestational age, Apgar score, baby birth weight, previous abortion, multiparity, previous CS, previous uterine surgery except for CS, preoperative coagulation abnormality, uterine myoma, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension or preeclampsia, antenatal hemorrhage, antenatal use of tocolytics, emergent CS, anterior placental position, and preoperative hemoglobin.

To compare variables between the two groups with and without blood transfusion, a chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test was performed for categorical data, and a Mann-Whitney test was performed for numerical data. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then conducted by collecting variables with P<0.1 in univariable analysis. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05.

RESULT

A total of 162 patients underwent CS for partial PP during the study period. Twelve patients with twin gestations were excluded from the analysis. One patient who underwent CS by a surgeon other than the two main surgeons was excluded (Fig. 1). As a result, a total of 149 patients were analyzed in this study. Of these, 22 (14.8%) required a blood transfusion. The median transfused packed RBCs in group B were two units. The median estimated blood loss was 600 mL in group N and 1,250 mL in group B, and the estimated blood loss of the patient with the most bleeding was 2,200 mL. This patient was transfused with eight units of packed RBCs.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram of the patient selection process in this study.

No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of blood transfusions between the two surgeons. In group N, 123 patients (96.9%) received spinal/epidural anesthesia, and four patients (3.1%) received general anesthesia. In group B, 19 patients (86.4%) received spinal/epidural anesthesia, and three patients (13.6%) received general anesthesia or were converted to general anesthesia after spinal/epidural anesthesia (Table 1). Although patients in group B received general anesthesia more often than those in group N, we did not include the type of anesthesia in the multivariable analysis (see discussion for details).

Table 1.

Perioperative characteristics in patients with and without blood transfusion

In univariable analysis, variables including gestational age, previous abortion, multiparity, antenatal hemorrhage, antenatal use of tocolytics, emergent CS, and preoperative hemoglobin had P<0.1. They were thus included in the multivariable analysis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of patients with and without blood transfusions

Multivariable logistic regression results show that risk factors independently associated with blood transfusion were antenatal hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 16.283; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.405-60.190; P<0.001) and preoperative hemoglobin (g/dL) (aOR, 0.427; 95% CI, 0.246-0.739; P=0.002) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of risk factors for blood transfusion

DISCUSSION

PP, a significant obstetric complication, is associated with postpartum hemorrhage, for which the most commonly accepted risk factors are the degree of previa, anterior placental position, maternal age, and previous CS [7-10,12]. Among these, the degree of previa is considered the greatest risk factor. Many clinicians consider postpartum hemorrhage relatively less concerning in patients with partial PP. This conception leaves clinicians under-prepared for reserving blood supplies, close patient monitoring, and other anesthetic management.

In this study, 22 (14.8%) of the 149 patients with partial PP required blood transfusions. This incidence rate is similar to those in previous studies, in which 8-33% of patients with either complete or partial PP experienced blood transfusion after CS [8,13,14]. The patients who required blood transfusions needed prompt treatment, close monitoring, and the attention of high-level medical professionals. This highlights the need for efficient anesthetic management approaches, including identifying risk factors for blood transfusion in patients with even partial PP.

Oya et al. [13] previously reported maternal age, previous curettage, and degree of previa as risk factors for blood transfusion in patients with PP. Kang et al. [15] created a scoring model for predicting massive transfusion, including maternal age, degree of previa, anterior placental position, and sonographic hypoechoic layer in patients with PP. Lee et al. [16] reported that risk factors for massive postpartum hemorrhage in patients with partial PP included previous curettage, short cervical length, and uteroplacental hypervascularity. These conflicting results may be due to different compositions of the study population, such as whether or not patients with both complete and partial PP were included. Different definitions of postpartum hemorrhage or blood transfusion and evaluated factors could have affected the results.

This study focused on risk factors for blood transfusion in patients with partial PP. Our results demonstrate that antenatal hemorrhage and preoperatively lower hemoglobin levels constitute independent risk factors. While the placenta normally attaches at the top or on the side of the uterus, in PP, it attaches low in the uterus and covers the cervix. This can result in bleeding during pregnancy and, consequently, a need for surgery, even if the cervix is only partially covered [17,18]. Our study showed that 45.5% of the patients in group B experienced antenatal hemorrhage, whereas this was the case for only 3.9% of the patients in group N. Patients with antenatal hemorrhage may be at risk for lower preoperative hemoglobin levels, with a greater attendant chance of requiring a blood transfusion. Therefore, these patients should be carefully managed with sufficient preparation for blood transfusion.

In contrast, other risk factors, such as anterior placental position and previous CS, that were identified as important in previous reports [6,7,9], were not associated with blood transfusion in this study. Since these previous reports included patients with both complete and partial PP, it may be concluded that these factors have a greater influence on the former group of patients. However, the lack of studies comparing risk factors for blood transfusion in patients with complete or partial PP indicates that further research is needed to clarify this.

This study is subject to several limitations. Our retrospective review of medical records did not allow the identification of potentially incorrect records. Additionally, we considered blood transfusion based on the estimated blood loss, a hemoglobin level below 8-10 g/dL, and clinical findings such as cardiovascular changes. However, determining the timing of a blood transfusion might vary from doctor to doctor. Another limitation was that the incidence of general anesthesia or conversion to general anesthesia after spinal/ epidural anesthesia occurred more often in group B. In Jeju National University Hospital, CS is routinely performed under spinal/epidural anesthesia. In contrast, general anesthesia has been employed only in a few exceptional cases when the obstetric surgeon or anesthesiologist expects much bleeding or when the patient presents coagulation abnormalities. For this reason, the anesthetic method was not included as a factor in the analysis of this study. However, general anesthesia is considered a risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage [1,19,20].

In conclusion, our findings indicate that antenatal hemorrhage and preoperatively lower hemoglobin levels may constitute independent risk factors for blood transfusion after CS in patients with partial PP. Therefore, patients at risk from these factors should be carefully managed with sufficient preparation for blood transfusion and anesthetic management.

Article information Continued